21 April 2024| Bracknell, UK [David Neal and Vanesa Pizzuto]
The Ellen G. White Symposium, “Understanding Ellen G. White and Her Prophetic Gift Today,” took place on the campus of Newbold College of Higher Education (NCHE) from 19 – 21 April, and was intentionally planned to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the first European Ellen G. White Research Centre. “This centre is very special because it was the first outside North America, which became the template for the other 19 research centres that we now have around the globe,” explained Audrey Andersson, General Vice-President of the General Conference and chair of the Ellen G. White Estate.
Initially established before the advent of the Internet, these centres provided access to crucial documents, artefacts, and books. “Now their significance has changed, as centres foster Adventist research and exploration of our history,” Andersson remarked. Rory Mendez, Director of the White Research Centre located on the Newbold campus, echoed Anderson’s sentiments, describing the centre as a platform for scholarly engagement, intergenerational participation, and the facilitation of a greater understanding of the Adventist church’s journey.
The Symposium, sponsored by the Trans-European Division (TED), attracted a diverse audience of between 800-1,000 participants of pastors, administrators, teachers, and members from across the TED territory. The youngest of these included a group of Scottish Mission Pathfinders from Glasgow attending in part requirement of their ‘God’s Messenger’ honour.
“Know it, believe it, experience it.”
With 14 presenters from around the world, Dr Merlin Burt (President/Director of the Ellen G. White Estate) opened the Symposium with his presentation, “Young Ellen and the Love of God”. His premise was that Ellen White had come to know the peace that the love of God offers in Christ, as a result of a three-stage conversion. “While she had clearly grasped the importance of being justified by faith, Ellen had yet to understand the reality that forgiveness and acceptance by Jesus do not necessarily keep one from sinning,” It was not until after going through a time of spiritual struggle that she came to understand the loving nature of God as a tender and compassionate father.
Concluding his presentation, Burt referenced an interview with Ellen White in 1914 near the end of her life: “I find tears running down my cheeks when I think of what the Lord is to His children, and when I contemplate His goodness, His mercy [and] His tender compassion.” His appeal was, “know it, believe it, experience it.” (1)
How Not to Read Ellen White Today
Dealing with one of the specific challenges to understanding Ellen White today, Dr Jan Barna (Principal Lecturer in Systematic and Biblical Theology, and Head of Research at NCHE) clarified that because Ellen White wrote from a different culture, time, language and worldview to our current experience, there is a need for ‘interpretation’ of what is written, so that we do not misunderstand the intent of what the author is wanting to share.
While “the historical and cultural gap is between roughly 100 to 170 years,” explained Barna, “given how humanity has changed over just the last 50 years of my lifetime, there is a big gap. And this is just on the level of the historical-cultural horizon.” His plea is that we ‘proceed carefully’ as we try to interpret what Ellen White has to share.
While some may misinterpret the need for interpretation as of suspicious motive, Barna suggested exactly the opposite. “This is a hermeneutical recognition that the person behind the text should be acknowledged with uttermost respect by genuine willingness to explore, in our case, Ellen White’s life experience, life context, belief system, worldview, and her language, including taking seriously the foundational assumptions with which she claims to write her writings.”
His appeal: “Expect to hear the prophetic voice from the author and her text and do so on the terms of Ellen White herself and not the terms of the reader.”
A female, embodied prophet
Dr Kevin Burton, the director of the Centre for Adventist Research at Andrews University, presented a session entitled “Ellen G. White: Literary Source and Gender.” In what proved to be one of the most thought-provoking presentations of the symposium, Burton explored Ellen White’s role as a female prophet and how gender biases have influenced the perspectives of both critics and apologists regarding her work. Burton remarked, “A common thread among members of both camps is their perception of Ellen White’s female body as problematic.” He went on to discuss how apologists often misinterpreted her frailty as evidence of her prophetic abilities, while critics tended to attribute her visions to various diseases, such as hysteria and histrionic personality disorder (HPD), using unreliable retrospective diagnoses. “Every aspect of Ellen White’s life, including her visions, was mediated by her female body,” said Burton, prompting the audience to consider what it would entail to approach her work with honour and respect for her female body.
Burton concluded his presentation by demolishing the myth that Ellen White was “God’s last choice” and only selected because two men declined the call. “The whole thing is a complete myth,” Burton reasoned. “William Ellis Foy didn’t refuse to share his visions. He published and shared them, continuing as a minister throughout his life.” Regarding Hazen Foss, Burton pointed out that there is limited information about him. The narrative suggesting he refused the call stems from a letter written by Ellen White, in which she discusses these matters. However, “she never does affirm that Hazen Foss received the same vision as she did. She merely recounts his words.”
Pointing to the lack of historical evidence to support this theory, Burton reflected, “It is ludicrous to think that she was God’s last choice and to connect this with her gender and femininity is lamentable… If anything, I’d be more inclined to think God chose her precisely because she was a woman… to make a point about the equality between the sexes for us today.”
One challenge easy to solve
When asked about the challenges of interpreting Ellen White’s writings, Anderson responded, “One challenge is that people simply don’t read Ellen White.” She proposed an experiment: “Take something simple like Steps to Christ and read a portion every day… It will draw you closer to the Bible.” Mendez further emphasised that reading White’s works reveals a clearer picture of God’s love. “The Conflict of the Ages series begins and ends with the phrase ‘God is love.’ This encapsulates the overarching message of her writings.”
Shaped the past, guides us in our present, inspires our future.
Reflecting on the Symposium, Daniel Duda (TED President) said: “We are thankful for how God used Ellen White to bless the Advent movement. At this Symposium, we have been blessed to explore the enduring legacy of Ellen White, her profound impact on spirituality, education and health. She has not only shaped the past of our church but continues to guide us in our present and inspire our future. If there is no forward movement in our lives, then something is seriously wrong. If there is no advancement in our lives, we are not led by the Spirit. Because where there is God’s Spirit, there is freedom to move forward; people are free to learn and to unlearn. We become the agents of hope, which is what our European society needs nowadays.”
[Photos: Vanesa Pizzuto, James Botha and David Neal]
A comprehensive record, sharing further the wide breadth of presentations shared at the Symposium, is to follow with a tedNEWS special due out in early summer.
- EGW interview with C. C. Crisler (July 21, 1914), EGWE
- Christan Experience and Teachings of Ellen G. White, p. 202
A record of the entire Symposium is available at the following links.
Friday Evening 6 pm
Sabbath Morning 8:45 am
Sabbath Morning 11 am
Sabbath Afternoon 2:45 pm
Sabbath Afternoon 5 pm
Sunday Morning 9:30 am
